Flashback stories time
> be me
> be art student
> be little asshole who thinks he knows all
> read socialist bull shit like Slavoj Zizek
In Welcome to the Desert of the Real there's a bit about Stockhausen and 9/11. Apparantly Karlheinz Stockhausen said the attack on the Twin Towers was the best (or something similar) artwork ever, and this could hardly be surpassed. The curious little edgelord I was, I googled it, to be able to shout: "9/11 war das beste Kunstwerk aller Zeiten!" (Is that correct German?) And I found this page — result number one on grand scholar google — with more information as to what Stockhausen actually said about 9/11.
As I said, I'm an absolute edgelord — can't help it — so I held on to that information and used it wherever I saw fit (everywhere). Did I believe that 9/11 was the ultimate artwork? Perhaps, I'm not even sure to be honest. I think, for a long time I might have believed that due to its massive impact, it could have been. Attention: thin ice ahead: Terrorismtm can qualify as art, depending on how you define art. A terrorist wants to have impact on people, just like an artist. Artists often want to provoke a public unsolicitedly. Be it aesthetically, morally, whatever. So same thing.
I have come to disagree with myself. Art is not so much the physical object anymore. It's a range of things, and to name a few:
Destruction is never a good way to critique something. You've got to act opposite; just like social justice warriors, who are actually white supremacists.